[Parlortricks] Gonzalez, Ex Post Facto...

[Peter Fraterdeus]

Insightful and disturbing analysis from brother Scottie.
P
------------------------------------------------------------------


	14 Feb.'05

Press Release Appended__/  on the Attorney General just confirmed --

		GONZALEZ, EX POST FACTO ~
		\______THE RISE OF PARTISAN LAW___	

      -- 'A News Commentary', motivated by the questions Senators failed to ask and the Press has not answered.  The 'pdf' doc is attached, text is below.

      Also attached, FYI -- the 2/10 cover letter faxed to U.S. Senators	Bill Frist, Ted Stevens, Jim Talent, Christopher Bond, Craig Thomas, John Kerry, Edward M. Kennedy, & Patrick Leahy.  It sets forth a public position & call for scrutiny, stating in part:

" For the record, we join the Red Cross, ACLU, and many rights advocates in calling for a full inquiry on Bush detainee policies - how they were enacted, the improper practices that continue, and what U.S. and International laws have been violated.

  For the future, there must be close oversight of this Attorney General, watching the politics and law of the cases he pursues - to deter further excesses of federal powers, and protect Constitutional freedoms of expression, association, privacy and due process. "

      -- offered for savvy journalism & public discourse... please post and forward freely, queries & ideas are most welcome.

				_s.addison (314-781-1042)__

		    _._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.



   PCU_//\_Free Assembly Project__
_//\______________________________an Association of Volunteers__/

      9 February 2005			~ A News Commentary ~

      For Public Release__	    ( Contact: scott addison, St.Louis MO
				    ( 314-781-1042, PCU at Free-Assembly.org


		GONZALEZ, EX POST FACTO ~
		\______THE RISE OF PARTISAN LAW___	

      The proceedings to confirm Alberto Gonzalez as Attorney General started out as routine.  On appearances, pundits thought this appointee far less polarizing than John Ashcroft was four years ago - then it got contentious.  Because of his history, and what he revealed and concealed in the hearings, murmurs of doubt grew to a public furor... rightly so.

      Unlike most nominees, the Senate needed to look at this man's
      very fitness for the job.  Seemingly he is not capable of
      acting true to the law, or above political expediency.

He came up as a Texas counsel & judge in the patronage politics of the Bush cabal:  A veritable 'poster child' of crony jurisprudence, he enacted their 'tough-on-crime' precepts and stridently punitive agenda, and lent legitimacy to their double standards.
   He was a major force in that State's accelerated executions, some of contested legality, and also its leniency on Enron & other favored corporations. 

His role as White House Counsel went beyond legal conjecture and client advice:  He wrote the key legal memos used by the Administration to vindicate prisoner abuse and torture, suspend habeas corpus protections, and implement such policies on a fast-track. 
   In so doing he advocated direct breaches of U.S. and International laws, devised ways to circumvent them, and expedited actual practices in violation.

      The outrages of Abu Graib and Guantanamo go beyond the maltreatment of detainees:  The Bush regime asserts new executive powers to change the rules, deny basic rights, and conduct torture - and Gonzalez is the prevaricator for their actions above the law. 

As always such actions are advanced as necessities of National Security and our protection.  But where they were condoned in the past only as exceptional interim measures, now in a self-perpetual hysteria over terrorism, on a permanent war footing, they are the rule.

As always the authorities of Federal agencies, courts, & police are expanded, and rights lost.  But where previously some burdens of proof, transparency, and prior law were upheld, the Gonzalez Doctrine claims overarching powers of enforcement and deadly interdiction upon an allegation of suspicion alone.  Policy and factual grounds are concealed in investigative secrecy, preempting all legal limits and accountability.

As always these actions are sold as essential to defend our Flag and our Freedoms.  On the contrary, this is the embellished logic of imperial control, bent on legal sanction to attack perceived enemies or dissent at will, and to deny fair redress as a matter of course.  In the long run, it's a move to rig the system and alter the foundations of American civics and law.

      Astonishingly, Gonzalez rides "conservative" credentials as a jurist, while his career has really betrayed the values and liberty interests of true conservatives.

      But this is 'NeoCon Law' - no longer about individual rights and limited government:  In their actions, briefs, and rulings, its practitioners have always supported maximum powers of state.  In the pale of Nixon, for 30 years they have persistently attacked personal privacy, expression, and due process, and pushed government beyond Constitutional bounds.

~  In the 1980's they cranked up the Drug War, using 'crimes of possession' to wedge 4th Amendment protections on search, seizure, and probable cause.  Meanwhile Reagan operatives lied and defied Congress, sending arms to Iran and insurgent terror to Central America. 

~  Bush Sr. had three terms in DC to pack federal agencies with GOP protegés, building a partisan infrastructure & culture of authority.  He quietly enacted sweeping FEMA police powers by Executive Order in 1991, then launched a clamorous show of force in the first Iraq War.

~  In the Clinton era, zealot federal agents ran amok at Ruby Ridge and Waco, and got away with it.  Republicans kept jamming judicial appointments, and the Democrats finally figured out how they had been stacking the courts for years on political litmus tests.

       Now Bush Jr. plays the high hand for true believers, vowing to kill terrorists and legislate morals - as Gonzalez makes up rationales for power, not "hypothetically" anymore, but still wrong. 
    John Mitchell invoked much the same 'sovereign immunity' arguments in 1969-70 to justify Nixon's wiretaps against dissidents - claims which the Supreme Court unanimously disdained as archaic and a threat to democracy.  United States v. United States District Court, 407 U.S. 297 (1972)

      So Gonzalez was confirmed anyway, another low for the U.S. Senate, really absurd.  On the record he espoused medieval law, while calling the Geneva Conventions "quaint".  Democrats raised some points of concern, but didn't connect the dots.  Republicans accused them of "partisan politics", yet fronted this ultimate spawn of judicial patronage.  On both sides, it was a failure of scrutiny on legal ethics & conduct, in a roomful of lawyers who should know:

* It is not a matter of speculation that Gonzalez might break the law for political purposes...  he has already done so under color of executive powers, with clear intent.

* There is no vague concern over his legal knowledge and objectivity in public interests...  his record is a litany of judicial errors & curtailed rights, driven by ideology.

      In the prospect of this Attorney General's tenure, there is cause to be wary and watchful. 

   As Bush persists in transnational terror wars, the climate of endangerment builds... 
With ongoing interdiction tactics, extreme practices on detainees will continue under military control, veiled from Congress.  As federal security agencies are "reorganized", legal boundaries of intelligence & enforcement will be more blurred, due process made discretionary.  With a huge domestic surveillance apparatus, they will push prosecutions of 'subversives' to criminalize dissent.  It was no accident that 1800 people were arrested in New York during the Republican Convention. 

   Bush has also called for a Constitutional Amendment to ban gay marriage...
The Justice Department will have to subvert separations of Church and State to justify this, and devise new criminal offenses to enforce it.  Of course the Constitution forbids such tampering with private lives, creeds, associations, and equal protection... and ultimately the 9th Amendment preserves the "rights... retained by the people" beyond Government reach, where it must never go - but Gonzalez does not grasp these sacred bounds.  The rhetoric reveals a dark irony:

      On Karl Rove's cue, Republicans rail against "activist judges" allowing gay unions, yet those rulings are models of judicial restraint - keeping government small, affirming personal & civil rights it has no power to deny.  In fact the NeoCons are the real 'activists', making government bigger by expanding its powers.  As always, say one thing, do another... but this is a high-stakes deception.

      At risk is the very idea of public law, in its limits and the balance of interests it serves.  In their hands it is an instrument of coercion, used to benefit narrow interests and impose their biases, mandates, and wars on the public.  Alberto Gonzalez has been a prime source of pseudo-legalisms in this agenda, an archetype of partisan law.  His rise is most signatory of its hypocrisy.

		________________________________________________


-- 
AzByCx DwEvFu GtHsIr JqKpLo MnNmOl PkQjRi ShTgUf VeWdXc YbZa&@

Peter Fraterdeus        http://www.fraterdeus.com  http://www.galenaphotos.com

http://www.semiotx.com	Web Strategy Consulting
"Words that work."(tm)  Communication Design and Typography